The Supreme Court recently, opened the doors for defence personnel in
peace stations to get registered as voters in constitutency of their
posting and pulled up the Election Commission for its "rigid stand"
which was coming in the way of "right to vote of service personnel".
After an hour-long deliberation, the Election Commission budged from
its stand and made a statement that those service personnel who have not
made declaration till now to cast vote through postal ballot "may
register themselves as 'General Voters' in respect of constituencies
where election process has not yet commenced". The apex court in its
interim order clarified that "this (order) is subject to such service
personnel being posted at peace station on January 1, 2014 and continued
to be posted till date". "We further
record and accept the statement of the senior counsel (of EC) that in
that situation the tenure posting of three years for such services
personnel and their family shall not be insisted upon," a bench
comprising justices R M Lodha and Kurian Joseph said in the order.
The bench asked the Centre to provide within two days from the date of verdict the
data of such peace stations to the Election Commission and also take all
necessary steps to make postal ballot effective. The apex court made it
clear that the "Election Commission is within its power to issue
instruction/guidelines prohibiting political parties from campaigning in
peace stations".
During the hearing, the bench asked the Commission to facilitate the
process to allow defence personnel to caste their votes in coming
general elections and raised questions on its reluctance for not
allowing them to cast votes in the constitutency of their posting by
putting in condition of working there at least three years and living
with family. It said the EC should not take a hard and technical stand
so that the statutory right of citizens is taken away. "What surprises
us is that when the EC desires 100 per cent polling why should the
Commission do anything which deprives a person his right to vote. There
must be some reasons behind it. It is a very important Constitutional
right and one should not be deprived of it," it said.
No comments:
Post a Comment